Email--Not Just Communication But a Legal Document of Record
The Internet has become so ingrained in everyday business that I'd venture to say not many of us even think about communicating or conducting everyday business with hardcopy anymore. Tracking documents through the standard U.S. postal service mailing options (registered or return receipt) has given way to a variety of sending and receiving options for email. Senders of emails will often attach documents, carbon and blind copy themselves as well as include large distribution lists--leaving emails scattered within inboxes, outboxes, or personal folders on local, network, and backup media.
Recipients on the other hand can receive messages in their inbox or have filters enabled that automatically detect junk or spam, move messages to alternative folders, or delete messages altogether. The paper trails of yesterday have given way to electronic bread crumbs that must be followed for locating email and attachments to prepare for impending litigation.
While we may think of email applications as a communication tool, the formal definition of what constitutes an individual email is changing. Regardless of an email's folder location, intent, or status, email is a vital piece of corporate electronic information and no different than any other document. Email is now much more than just a communication mechanism but a legal document of record that can be used to an organization's advantage. Consider these recent court cases:
Recipients on the other hand can receive messages in their inbox or have filters enabled that automatically detect junk or spam, move messages to alternative folders, or delete messages altogether. The paper trails of yesterday have given way to electronic bread crumbs that must be followed for locating email and attachments to prepare for impending litigation.
While we may think of email applications as a communication tool, the formal definition of what constitutes an individual email is changing. Regardless of an email's folder location, intent, or status, email is a vital piece of corporate electronic information and no different than any other document. Email is now much more than just a communication mechanism but a legal document of record that can be used to an organization's advantage. Consider these recent court cases:
- Kasten v. Doral Dental USA, LLC, 2007 Wisc. LEXIS 405 (Wis. June 22, 2007), the Wisconsin Supreme Court reversed and rejected the findings of the trial court's conclusion that email was a communication rather than a document. They concluded that "Company documents" in the company's operating agreement was, in fact, a broader term than "records" and included drafts and emails that were not private communications.
- Roth v AON Corporation (N.D. Ill. January 8, 2009), Magistrate Judge Morton Denlow held that an e-mail and attached draft of disclosure language circulated for comment among corporate employees and in-house counsel was protected from eDiscovery by plaintiffs in a pending securities fraud action.
- Citing Sedona Principles, Court Allows Forensic Imaging of Former Employee's Home Computer. In this case, the court stepped in so that unintentional destruction of relevant evidence on home computer was halted
- Court Denies Motion to Suppress E-mail Evidence Obtained from Internet Service Providers. The court found that the Stored Communications Act (SCA) does not provide a suppression remedy and concluded that the government's reliance on the SCA was objectively reasonable.
- Court Denies Employee's Claim of Privilege in Email Sent from Employee Email Account over Employer Server. The court agreed that corporate email is to be used solely for business purposes and that employees have no personal privacy rights in any material created or communicated on the company computer systems.
- Court Orders Production of Relevant Material in Spite of Alleged Computer Incompetence. This statement pretty much says it all


fyi
This is very important and thank you for citing the cases.